Judgement
Federal High Court Fixes September 24 for Judgment in Hamma Saleh’s Suit Against Pantami’s PDP Candidacy
By Our Court Reporter
The Federal High Court sitting in Gombe has fixed Thursday, September 24, 2026, for judgment in a pre-election suit instituted by a Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship aspirant, Alhaji Abdulkadir Hamma Saleh, challenging the emergence of Professor Isa Ali Ibrahim Pantami as the party’s candidate for the 2027 Gombe State governorship election.
The judgment is scheduled to be delivered at 9:00 a.m. before the Federal High Court, Gombe Division.
The suit, filed by Hamma Saleh, centres on the legality of the process through which Pantami emerged as the PDP governorship candidate, as well as the plaintiff’s alleged exclusion from the party’s governorship primary.
Saleh is challenging the nomination process and has asked the court to determine whether the procedures adopted by the PDP complied with the relevant provisions of the law, the party’s constitution, rules and guidelines.
A major issue arising from the case is whether Pantami met the applicable legal requirements to participate in the PDP governorship primary and whether the process that culminated in his emergence as the party’s candidate was conducted in accordance with the law.
Pantami emerged as the PDP governorship candidate on May 26, 2026, following a primary election in Gombe at which he was declared the sole aspirant and emerged through voice affirmation. Reports at the time indicated that the development followed his movement from the All Progressives Congress (APC) to the PDP.
Prior to the primary, Hamma Saleh and other PDP governorship aspirants had raised objections to Pantami’s participation in the party’s nomination process. Saleh later proceeded to challenge the process in court, alleging, among other issues, that he had been screened and cleared to participate in the primary but was not informed of the eventual date and conduct of the exercise.
The plaintiff is asking the court to examine the circumstances surrounding the nomination exercise and determine the legal validity of the process that produced Pantami as the party’s standard-bearer.
The defendants in the suit include the Peoples Democratic Party, Professor Isa Ali Ibrahim Pantami and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), among other parties joined in the proceedings.
The case came before Justice Amina Aliyu Mohammed of the Federal High Court in Gombe, where the parties have presented their respective positions through court processes, documentary evidence and legal submissions. Earlier proceedings in the matter had been adjourned for further hearing before the case eventually proceeded toward judgment.
The court is expected to determine the questions placed before it strictly on the basis of the pleadings, evidence, exhibits and legal arguments presented by the parties.
The outcome of the judgment could have implications for the PDP’s nomination process in Gombe State, particularly because the case directly concerns the emergence of its governorship candidate for the 2027 election.
However, the legal effect of the judgment will depend on the specific findings, declarations and orders contained in the court’s decision.
The case has generated considerable interest among political stakeholders and followers of the 2027 governorship contest in Gombe State, given the positions taken by the parties over the PDP nomination process.
With judgment now scheduled for September 24, the parties and other interested stakeholders are expected to await the court’s determination on the issues submitted for adjudication.
The Federal High Court, Gombe Division, is expected to deliver its judgment at 9:00 a.m. on Thursday, September 24, 2026.
Judgement
Federal High Court Orders GOGIS,DG to Release Contract Records,Awards ₦200,000 Costs to Applicant
By Our Court Correspondent
The Federal High Court No. 1 sitting in Gombe has ordered the Gombe Geographic Information Systems (GOGIS) and its Director-General, Kabiru Usman Hassan, to pay ₦200,000 as costs to the applicant, Nafi’u Abubakar, in a landmark Freedom of Information (FOI) case.
The judgment was delivered by Justice Amina Aliyu Mohammed, who granted Reliefs 1, 2, 3 and 4 sought by the applicant, while declining Reliefs 5 and 6, except to the extent of awarding ₦200,000 as costs in favour of the applicant.
The suit, commenced by an Originating Summons filed on 8 January 2026, was brought pursuant to the provisions of Sections 1, 2, 4, 7 and 20 of the Freedom of Information Act, 2011, as well as under the inherent jurisdiction of the court.
The applicant asked the court to determine whether, under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, he was entitled to access public records requested in a letter dated 9 November 2025 concerning the award of a contract for the redesign of the Shehu Abubakar District Layout in Gombe State.
The requested documents included the list of companies that expressed interest in the project, copies of advertisements and calls for expressions of interest, bids and proposals submitted by contractors, the name of the successful contractor or contractors, the contract value, evidence of payments made, the letter of award and acceptance, the project profile, and other related documents.
The applicant also sought a declaration that the respondents’ failure to provide the requested information within seven days of receiving the request constituted a violation of Sections 4 and 7 of the Freedom of Information Act, 2011.
In his reliefs, the applicant prayed the court to declare that he was entitled to the requested information and that the refusal of the respondents to disclose the documents was unlawful.
He further sought a mandatory order compelling GOGIS and its Director-General to immediately release all documents requested in his Freedom of Information application dated 9 November 2025, including records relating to the procurement process, contract award, project implementation, and any other documents connected with the redesign of the Shehu Abubakar District Layout.
The applicant also requested an order directing the respondents to provide written reasons for any aspect of the request they intended to deny.
In addition, he sought ₦100 million as general damages for the alleged unlawful refusal to grant access to the requested public records and ₦5 million as the cost of the action.
In its judgment, however, the court declined the claims for general damages and litigation costs but awarded ₦200,000 as costs against the respondents.
The applicant, Nafi’u Abubakar, was represented by Barrister M. U. Faruk, while the respondents, GOGIS and its Director-General, Kabiru Usman Hassan, were represented by Barrister Musa Adamu Kumo.
Court
Court Set to Rule on APC Balanga/Billiri Primary Controversy
By Our Political Reporter
The Federal High Court No. 2 sitting in Gombe has reserved judgment in a suit challenging the emergence of the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate for the Balanga/Billiri Federal Constituency ahead of the 2027 general elections.
The suit was instituted by an APC aspirant, Mr. John Alfred, who is challenging the victory of Hon. Ali Isa J.C. as the party’s candidate for the House of Representatives seat.
Counsel to the plaintiff, Barrister Ahmed Musa, told the court that no valid APC primary election was conducted in the Balanga/Billiri Federal Constituency on May 18, 2026, as required by law. He alleged that no election took place in any of the 20 wards across Balanga and Billiri Local Government Areas, yet the APC declared Hon. Ali Isa J.C. as the winner of the primary election.
The plaintiff urged the court to nullify the declaration of Hon. Ali Isa J.C. as the APC candidate and order the APC and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to conduct a fresh primary election, arguing that the process was marred by substantial irregularities.
In his defence, counsel to the first defendant, Hon. Ali Isa J.C., J.J. Adamu, SAN, filed a motion on notice alongside a preliminary objection, urging the court to dismiss the suit. He maintained that the APC primary election was validly conducted across the Balanga/Billiri Federal Constituency.
The senior lawyer further informed the court that Hon. Ali Isa J.C. resigned from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) on April 14, 2026, relinquished his position as the Minority Leader in the House of Representatives, and subsequently obtained valid membership of the APC before participating in the party’s primary election.
He relied on Order 4 Rule 6 of the Federal High Court Practice Directions, arguing that the plaintiff’s suit lacked merit and should be struck out.
Also, counsel to the APC, Barrister Muzzammil Yahaya, raised a preliminary objection challenging the competence of the suit and the jurisdiction of the court to entertain the matter. He urged the court to dismiss the case for being incompetent.
Counsel to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Barrister Bashi M. Abubakar, told the court that the commission monitored the APC primary elections across Gombe State and confirmed that it has the official list of candidates who emerged from the exercise.
After listening to the submissions of all parties, the presiding judge, Justice Verah Eneibor Ibrahim, reserved judgment and said a date for the delivery of the judgment would be communicated to all parties through their respective counsel.
Judgement
Gombe High Court Slams ₦1.5 Million Fine on Four Over Land Trespass
By Editor Daily Fact
The Gombe State High Court, presided over by the Chief Judge, Justice Halima Sadiya Mohammed, has convicted four individuals for unlawful trespass on a parcel of land belonging to Alhaji Hammadu Masu, after years of legal battle over ownership.
Delivering judgment in the case, Justice Mohammed ordered the defendants to jointly pay the sum of ₦1 million as exemplary damages and an additional ₦500,000 as legal costs to the plaintiff. The court further directed them, their agents, and assigns to desist immediately from any further trespassing on the disputed property.
The case, which has lingered for nearly a decade, traces back to a ruling by Justice Sa’ad Mohammed of High Court No. 2 in Gombe, who had earlier declared Alhaji Hammadu Masu as the rightful owner of the land about nine years ago. Despite that judgment, the defendants reportedly continued encroaching on the property, prompting the latest legal action.
In her ruling, Justice Halima Sadiya Mohammed emphasized that the plaintiff had proven his case beyond reasonable doubt, and that the defendants’ continued trespass amounted to a blatant disregard for the rule of law and previous court decisions.
The convicted individuals include Ibrahim Bello, Babawuro Buba Biri (also known as Mohammed B. Loddo), Sulaiman S. Ahmed, and the Surveyor General of the Ministry of Lands and Survey, Gombe State.
The court’s decision has been hailed by legal observers as a clear signal that land rights and court judgments must be respected, especially by public officials and individuals entrusted with enforcing land administration laws.
Residents of the area where the disputed property is located have expressed relief over the judgment, describing it as a “victory for justice and lawful ownership.”
-
Politics3 years agoFormer Gombe State APC Promoters Forum Chairman Attacked Following Political Commentary
-
Appointment2 years agoGombe State Indigene, Appointed New Vice Chancellor (ATBU)
-
Leadership2 years agoBreaking: African Union Appoints Pantami as Co-Chair of the 4th Industrial Revolution Policy Council
-
Death2 years agoProminent Nigerian Islamic Scholar, Sheikh Sa’idu Hassan Jingir, Passes Away
-
Health2 years agoGombe State Organizes Onboarding Workshop for Private Healthcare Facilities
-
Water2 years agoGombe Government Mobilizes Stakeholders to Combat Illegal Water Connections
-
Politics2 years agoGombe State Inaugurates Human Capital Development Council
-
Politics2 years agoGombe State Launches Presidential Palliative Program (PPP) to Aid Small Businesses
